Key to Reading
comprehension in the post 51
Passage 1
Learning
experience 2
a.
teachers (from ‘teaching’ in the title)
b.
what goes on in the classroom while teaching and learning.
Because emotions of human beings are
involved in the whole process of the education
system.
c.
performers other than us
d.
the teacher’s
e.
values, relative
f.
Just as we love animals that we rear at home and are affected by anything that
may happen
to them, we love our definitions of success
and failure and are affected by criticisms from
others.
g.
‘Actors’ actually ‘pretend’ to be what they are not. Whereas there’s no
pretention in the
case of teachers because what they do is
real.
Learning
experience 3
We
as teachers should perform our duties without bothering about success or
failure or criticisms from others because we are bound by the morals of the
teaching profession.
Learning
experience 5
As
teachers we are part of teaching-learning situation. But we are not the only
people involved in this situation. There are others like learners, syllabus
designers, examining bodies. These people have a say in our success or failure
as teachers. It all depends on how well or poorly these people discharge their
responsibilities. We may work hard, others may not, and failure will result.
This is not the only problem. Who can with certainty say what success or
failure really is? I may not accept others’ descriptions and others may not
accept mine. While I may think I am a failure, others may think I am a success.
There are two problems then: the knowledge that we may not achieve success in
our teaching. The difficulty in deciding the definitions of success and failure
that are acceptable to all. As a result, we might lose heart, we might give in,
and we might become mechanical. But these shouldn’t happen. Because we accepted
a commitment when we entered the teaching profession. The commitment is an
implicit one and a moral one, too. Whatever the odds, we must fulfill our
commitment by teaching to the very best of our abilities without worrying about
the results of our actions and without allowing this worry to bring down our
level of performance.
___________________________________________________________________________
Passage 2
Learning
experience 3
It was
autumn again,/ October,/ his sixth year in the monastery./ The ruddy glow of
sunset
/tinted the brilliant maples on the hill./ He heard the rattle/ of the
serving hatch,
then
the familiar scrape and thump of a cup and bowl/ being set on the shelf/
beside his
door.
/
5 He
glanced toward the tiny hole/ at the base of the workman wall/ where Stuart
Little
suddenly
appeared. /The mouse sat on his haunches,/ raising its forearms /to brush his
whiskers.
/
All
you need /is a knife, fork and bib,/ Drew silently joked,/ amused at/ how the
rattle of
the
serving hatch/ had become Stuart Little’s dinner bell./
10 The
mouse scurried over/ as Drew brought the meal/ to the workbench./ Bread and
water;/
another fast-day./ His stomach rumbling,/ he noticed Stuart/ trying to climb up
his
robe,
/and with a sigh of feigned disgust,/ he tore a piece of bread,/ tossing it
down to the
mouse.
/He sat at the bench and bowed his head, /pressing his hands together
praying. /
You
know, Stuart, /he thought as he finished, /you’re getting greedy./ I ought to
make
15 you
wait to eat/ till grace is finished./ A little religion/ wouldn’t hurt you./
How would y
you
feel about that, huh?/
He
glanced toward the mouse on the floor./
And
frowned./ The mouse lay on its side,/ unmoving./ Drew stared in surprise,/
not
moving
either./ His chest tensed./ Shocked,/ he held his breath,/ then blinked and
20 inhaling
slowly,/ bent down to touch Stuart’s side./
It
remained inert./
|
Drew
gently nudged it,/ feeling the soft sleek fur,/ but got no response./ His throat seemed lined with
sand./ As he swallowed painfully,/ he picked Stuart up./ The mouse lay still in his palm./ It weighed almost nothing./ But the weight was dead./
25 Drew’s
stomach felt cold./ In dismay,/ he shook his head, baffled./ A minute ago,/ the mouse had practically been
dancing for its supper./
Was it
old age, he wondered./ A heart attack?/ Or a stroke?/ He didn’t know much about mice,/ but he vaguely recalled having
read somewhere that they didn’t live long./ A year or two./
But that was in the wild,/ exposed to predators,/ disease,/ and cold./ What about here, in 30 the cell?/ He strained to think,/ telling himself that even with
warmth and good care,/
Stuart Little had been bound to
die./ There wasn’t any way to know how old it
had been/
when it showed up last autumn,/ but in human terms/ by now it might have been
ninety./
I shouldn’t be surprised./ By feeding it,/ I merely postponed.../ If it hadn’t died today.../
Tomorrow./
35 He bit his lip, grieving/ as he set the small corpse back
on the floor./ And felt guilty
because he grieved./ A Carthusian was supposed to
shut all worldly distractions./ God
alone mattered./ The mouse had been temptation
that he should have resisted./ Now God
was punishing him,/ teaching him why he shouldn’t
become infatuated with transitory
creatures./
40 Death./
Drew shuddered./ No. I wouldn’t change anything./ The mouse was fun to have
around./
I’m glad I took care of it./
His eyes stung,/ making him blink repeatedly/ as stared down at his lifeless
friend./
Terrible thoughts occurred to
him./ What should he do with the body?/ For sure,/ he
45 wasn’t
going to have a custodian brother dispose
of it,/ perhaps even dump it in the
trash./ The mouse deserved better./ The dignity of burial./
But where?/ Through misted vision,/ he glanced toward his workroom
window./ Sunset
had turned to dusk,/ casting his garden into shadow./
A cedar bush grew in a corner of
the wall./ Yes, Drew thought./ He’d bury Stuart Little
50 beneath the shrub./ An evergreen,/ it lived all year./ Even in winter,/ its color would be a
reminder./
His throat felt swollen,/ aching each time he swallowed./ Thirsty, he reached for his cup
of water,/ raised it toward his lips,/ glanced past it toward the thick
slab of bread in his bowl./
|
And paused. /
55 His spine began to tingle. /
He peered down at the bread on
the floor,/ the chunk he’d thrown to Stuart Little./ He
stared at the water in the cup he
held./ And slowly,/ cautiously,/ making sure that no
liquid spilled over the top, / he
eased the container back down on the table. /
Reflexively,/ he wiped his hands
on the front of his robe. /
60 No, he thought./ It couldn’t be./
But what if you’re not
imagining?/
His suspicion filled him with
shame./ In his sixth stern year of
penance,/ did he still
retain the habit of thinking as
he had in his former life?/ Had his training been that
effective?/
65 Were his instincts that resistant
to change?/
But just supposing./ You know,/
for the sake of argument./ What kind might it be?/ Did it
kill on contact?/
Tensing,/ he stared at his
hands./ No, he ‘d touched the mouse./
And the bread./ Just a
minute ago./ But the mouse had
died quickly./ In the time Drew had taken to close his
70 eyes and say grace./ If it’s poison and
it kills on contact,/ even with my greater size,/ I
ought to be dead, too./
He
breathed./
All right,
then,/ it had to be ingested./ (You’ve got to stop thinking this way.)/
And it’s
powerful. / Almost instantaneous.
75 Assuming it’s poison./
Of
course, just assuming./ After all, it’s still possible that Stuart Little
died from natural
causes./ (But what would have you thought six years
ago?)/
He
struggled to repress his terrible memories./ Now God’s testing me again./
He’s using
this
death to learn if I’ve truly purged myself./ A man of detachment would never
think 80 like this./ (But in the old
days../. Yes?/ you thought this way
all the time./)
He
narrowed his vision till all he saw was the unmoving mouse on the floor./
Slowly,/
frowning
so hard he felt the beginnings of a headache,/ he raised his eyes toward the
serving
hatch beside his door. /
The hatch
was closed./ But beyond was a corridor./ (No, it makes no sense./ Not HERE,/ 85 not NOW!/ Who?/ Why?/)
|
Besides, he was merely guessing./ The only way to know for sure if
the bread had been
poisoned was to.../
Taste it?/ Hardly./
Have it tested?/ That would take too long./
90 But there was another way./ He could investigate the monastery./ He stiffened with doubt./
The notion repelled him./
But under the circumstances.../
He stared at the door./ In the six years he’d been here,/ he’d left his quarters seldom,/ only
to convene with the other monks
for mandatory communal rituals./ Those ventures outside
95 had been keenly disturbing to him,. nerve-racking intrusions on his
peace of mind./
But under the circumstances.../
He wiped his sweaty lip./ His years of disciplined regimen
told him to wait a short while
longer/ until he normally left for vespers./ Yes./ The decision calmed him./ Avoiding
extremes,/ it appealed to his common sense./
100 The vespers bell stayed silent,/ but in rhythm with his daily
cycle,/ he knew that it should
have struck by now./ He told himself that the mouse’s
death had disturbed his
judgement./ Time was passing with exaggerated
slowness,/ that was all./
He counted to one hundred./ Waited./ Started to count again.. And stopped./
With a painful sign,/ he repressed his inhibitions,/ broke six years of habit,/ and opened 105 the door.
[an excerpt
from The Fraternity of the Stone by David Morrell, New English Library 1987)
|
Learning
experience 4
The
manner in which Stuart Little died leads Drew to thinking that someone tried to
kill him with poison in the bread.
Learning
experience 5
The
quick death of Stuart Little makes Drew wonder about the cause of death. He
feels neither old age or heart attack or stroke could’ve killed the mouse. He
believes that there could be poison in the bread that was meant for him that
killed Stuart. The only to find out why someone wished him dead was to
investigate the monastery and so he decides to step out of his cell.
Learning
experience 6
Hypothesis
one
Stuart
Little died from natural causes
Analysis
Stuart
Little may have been old enough to die. Or it could’ve died from heart attack
or stroke.
Conclusion
It’s
possible that Stuart’s death was a natural one.
Hypothesis
two
One
moment Stuart was alive, the next moment he was dead. Such quick death could’ve
been caused by poison in the bread.
Analysis
If
it was poison in the bread that killed Stuart, there could be poison in the
water, too. So Drew didn’t drink water though he was thirsty. He’d touched
Stuart and hasn’t died, so it wasn’t poison that killed on contact. It had to
be ingested into something like bread for instance. And it had to be a powerful
one because Stuart died in the time Drew said his prayers. All this was mere
guessing on Drew’s part. To know for certain, he had to investigate the
monastery and find evidence for his assumption.
Conclusion
Drew
could conclude about Stuart’s death and whether someone tried to kill him by
injecting poison in the bread only by stepping out of his cell and look for
evidence in the monastery.
Passage three
Learning
experience 1
The
speaker has to decide the future with the other person
Key
words: cross-roads, leave or come, lingered, doubts, love, face, road
Learning
experience 2
i.
your teacher will help if necessary
ii.
‘doubt’ is compared to ‘darkness’, ‘love’ to ‘lamp’ and ‘road’ to ‘leave or
come’
contrast is between ‘darkness’ and the
light the ‘lamp’ provides
iii.
The problem is to continue or discontinue the journey of life with the beloved
Yes, it is solved. The solution is the
speaker to go with the beloved.
Learning
experience 3
Keyword implied
meaning
a.
crossroads a very important moment in the
speaker’s life when the
person has to take a decision that will affect his future life
and someone else’s, too.
b.
leave or come
It’s time for the speaker to take a decision
c.
lingered
The speaker mulled over the problems deciding one way or
the other could cause for both
the people involved
d.
doubts
the speaker had doubts about the happiness of the union or
sadness resulting from separation
e.
love
The speaker’s partner’s facial expression showed the way
f.
face
The partner’s face provided the solution
g.
road
indicates the partner’s help
ii.
The pronouns refer to the speaker and the partner. ‘We’ refers to both the
speaker and the partner, ‘I’ to the speaker and ‘you’, to the partner. The
speaker uses ‘we’ to show that they have come to a critical stage in their lives,
‘I’ to say the responsibility of taking a decision lies with the speaker, ‘you’
to show the partner’s readiness to travel with the speaker.
The
speaker uses ‘and’ to indicate the flow and sequence of thoughts, and ‘but’ to
contrast the confusion in the mind of the speaker with the clarity in the mind
of the partner.
L.E.
4
i.
In all probability the ‘I’ refers to the man because generally speaking women
are expressive of their emotions than men.
ii.
The problem could’ve arisen from any of the several aspects: status difference,
opposition from the man’s family, difference in religion, nationality or race.
iii.
Hope you enjoyed the poem. What aspect of the poem did you enjoy? If you didn’t
enjoy the poem can you say why?
You state your personal reasons and the
logic
iv.
Use a dictionary to know what ‘mesh’ means to decide the appropriateness of the
title.
l.e.
5
Come
away, divide, difference, faithful, safe, see, dissolve, dark, merge, join,
unchallenged harmony
l.e.
6
i.
avoidance of criticism and scrutiny of the public (and the relatives)
b.
The speaker in poem one is at a critical stage and has to make a decision
whereas the speaker is only keen on avoiding the glares of the public and has
thus not come to a phase where a decision needs to be made.
ii.
a. Staying away from the questioning looks and shutting out the world by
seeking asylum in the living quarters.
b.
The speaker in the second poem reacts to the moment and seeks only temporary
solution whereas the speaker in the first has to make a permanent decision.
iii.
a. ‘Streets’ and ‘show windows’ stand for ‘light’ which highlights the
differences between the speaker and the partner. ‘grey’ is akin to ‘white’ aka
‘light’ and ‘dark’ is akin to ‘black’.
b.
In ‘The Mesh’ ‘darkness’ identifies ‘doubts’ and a clash of thought in the mind
of the speaker and ‘light’ points to the selfless love the partner has for the
speaker. In ‘Come away, my love’, ‘light’ refers to the harm the speaker
experiences and ‘darkness’, to the comfort the speaker experiences.
l.e.
7
i.
‘mankind eyes divide’ and ‘show windows reflect our differences’
ii.
It’s an excellent metaphor; ‘faith’ always accepts things as they are and
doesn’t question them. In the room, there’s safety because there’s no one else
except the speaker and the partner, and they are faithful to each other.
iii.
In the streets, the pair is not alone whereas in the room they are by
themselves so the speaker sees only the partner and none else in the room.
iv. ‘divide’, difference’, ‘dark’ and ‘grey’
v.
The speaker is probably a Negro and the
parter is a White.
vi.
The piano refers to the merged and entwined bodies and as the bodies press and
move they produce a oneness that is heard when the piano provides excellent
music coming out of the fingers pressing the keys.
Le.8
The
teacher may help, if necessary.
___________________________________________________________________________
Note
about the writers of the two poems:
‘The
Mesh’ is written by Kwesi Brew, a poet from Ghana (north West Africa). This
brief but subtle poem is one of the frequently anthologised poems of Kwesi
Brew. In his collection ‘The Shadows of Laughter’, it occurs in the section
subtitled ‘Today we look at each other’.
‘Come
away, my love’ is written Joseph Kariyuki, a Kenyan poet (north East Africa).
You
can also enjoy these great writers:
Nigerians
Chinua Achebe
Wole Soyinka (who won Nobel
Prize for literature in 1986)
Elechi Amadi
Gabriel Okara
South African
writer
Peter Abrahams (his memoir: Tell
Freedom)
novels:
The Path of Thunder (1948), A Wreath for Udomo (1956), A
Night of Their Own (1965)
___________________________________________________________________________